Coaching Engagement
Active Clients
161
Active Airtable clients only.
Avg Engagement
62.9
Calls, group calls, Mighty, and NPS when present.
Fathom Coaching
88.4
Separate coaching-quality signal.
Engagement Status Mix
WatchMost active clients need more consistent participation.
10364.0%
IncompleteEnough data is missing to avoid over-reading the score.
2817.4%
At RiskNeeds direct retention attention.
2213.7%
StrongHealthy engagement across the available signals.
85.0%
Top Engaged Members
Highest active-client engagement scores in the May 20 snapshot.
Joe Kennedy
Jon Allen. Strong calls, group calls, and Mighty; 100% data coverage.
96
Strong
Aaron Wenburg
Andrew Mayhew. Strong calls and group calls; NPS 10; 100% data coverage.
91
Strong
Andrea Quigley
Jon Allen. Strong 1:1 call signal and NPS 10; group and Mighty sit in watch.
89
Watch
Patrick Daley
Logan Sunday. Strong 1:1 and Mighty engagement; group call participation is watch.
89
Strong
Bobby Roberts
Logan Sunday. Strong 1:1 engagement with consistent but watch-level group and Mighty signals.
84
Watch
Jacob Polzin
Tim Cardon. Strong 1:1, Mighty, and NPS 9; next call is visible.
84
Strong
Leadership Readout
Group calls: This is the clearest engagement drag. Only 13 active clients are strong here, while 148 sit in watch, so attendance and live participation are the biggest places to improve.
Mighty: The community signal is mixed. 9 clients are strong, 63 are watch, 51 are risk, and 38 active clients still have no Mighty data, which makes follow-up harder to target.
Coaching calls: The 1:1 rhythm is healthier than the group layer, with 81 strong, 49 watch, and 31 risk. Fathom coaching quality is strong at 88.4, so the issue looks more like participation consistency than coaching quality.
Sources: Airtable EngagementOS, Airtable ClientsOS, Airtable Mighty Engagement, Airtable NPS, and Airtable FathomOS. Refreshed May 20, 2026; active-client engagement only.